...we could simulate complex decisions before making them?

…context wasn’t just input — but a 

...reasoning wasn’t a black box, but a living process we could simulate, observe, and learn from?

...teams, organizations, or even entire societies could test strategies in a virtual environment — safely, repeatedly, and at scale?

...AI agents could represent different stakeholders, negotiate trade-offs, and adapt their behavior over time?

…cities could simulate new policies before implementing them — understanding their ripple effects across diverse communities?

…simulation became a core part of software development, organizational strategy, and creative thinking?

simulate, package, and transfer knowledge?

 — not just running agents to complete tasks, but 

orchestrating dynamic, multi-agent simulations

 that explore how decisions emerge over time, how coordination succeeds or fails, and how strategies evolve in response to uncertainty, context, and feedback.

, negotiate, compete, align, and adapt. Where behaviours aren’t predefined, but emergent. Where each run isn’t a fixed pipeline, but a living system — a controlled experiment in collective intelligence.

This is more than task automation. It’s the foundation for understanding 

 at scale: how systems of intelligent agents behave, learn, and self-organize under pressure.

To build the next generation of AI systems, we’ll need to go beyond benchmarks and capabilities. 

We’ll need to simulate. Continuously. Systematically. At scale.

And from those simulations, derive the insights to design better agents — and ultimately, better systems.



We need simulators that act as laboratories for intelligence

 — dynamic sandboxes where ideas can collide, coordination can be tested, failure can be observed, and emergence can be measured. Simulators that don’t just test what agents can do, but 

Because to build truly adaptive AI, we must first understand the systems they will shape — and the systems that will shape them.

, a new kind of IDE for context engineering. A place where you can simulate, observe, and shape behavior in motion.

In the next post, we’ll open the black box. You’ll get a closer look at how Autobox works under the hood — the architecture, the components, and the design principles behind orchestrating multi-agent simulations.

Part 3: Inside Autobox’s Agent-Based Simulations

Rehearsing the Future

The Next Layer of Intelligence (part 2)

Over the past few years, we’ve seen AI evolve from passive assistants to autonomous agents — capable of reasoning (or at least giving the 

While the foundations of traditional software engineering remain essential, they fall short on their own when applied to AI-native applications.

 Deterministic logic, fixed inputs, and predictable outcomes still provide the scaffolding for reliable systems — but they weren’t built for components that learn, adapt, and behave probabilistically. Building AI systems demands more than control flow and state machines — it requires embracing uncertainty, feedback, and emergence as part of the design space.

AI applications demand a new kind of infrastructure — one that embraces uncertainty, supports iteration at scale, and orchestrates complex interactions between intelligent agents.

Multi-agent systems are already at work in production: optimizing workflows, generating content, navigating search, and solving complex tasks in parallel.

To make these systems truly useful and aligned, we must master the art of 

 — the emerging discipline of designing, structuring, and dynamically orchestrating the information that agents consume to reason and act. Context is no longer static input; it's a programmable layer of intelligence. What data is retrieved, how it's framed, and when it's injected into the agent’s loop can radically change outcomes. 

We’re not just coding behavior anymore. We’re cultivating it. In a world of emergent behavior, context is code.

To build, measure, and improve today’s AI systems, evaluations and A/B tests are essential.

 They help optimize performance, compare model variants, and guide product decisions with measurable evidence. They allow us to validate prompts, assess user preferences, and fine-tune experiences.

But while effective, sometimes these methods are inherently limited — they offer static snapshots of behavior captured under fixed conditions. 

They tell us what worked — but not why it worked, or how behavior evolved over time.. They work well when the problem is stable and the feedback is immediate. But as we move toward systems that reason over time, collaborate with others, or learn from interaction, these evaluations miss crucial dynamics.

They rarely account for the progression of reasoning, the flow of interaction, or the complexity of long-term behavior and collaborate — especially in multi-agent environments. They treat intelligence as a score — not as something that unfolds in context, across time, and in relation to others. And in doing so, they often overlook the system dynamics, feedback loops, and emergent behaviors that arise when intelligent agents operate together in complex, open-ended scenarios.

We see this gap clearly when using LLM evaluations to score multi-turn conversations, but failing to detect whether an agent’s behavior degrades, improves, or adapts over time. Or when A/B testing two chat experiences reveals a preference difference — but offers no insight into why one agent earned trust, aligned goals, or negotiated more effectively. In multi-agent systems, success isn’t just about accuracy or speed — it’s about collaborative intelligence, resilience, and emergent strategies. 

The AI space is evolving and accelerating. With every new model, feature, tool, and piece of hardware, we unlock a bit more depth in reasoning, memory, and adaptation. And this trajectory points toward a future where simulation, coordination, and behavior modeling won’t be optional — they’ll be 

Here’s what I believe is coming — and why Autobox is designed with that future in mind.

Simulated Reasoning Becomes Standard Practice

LLMs will become dramatically more performant, multimodal, and personalized.

 They’ll better understand nuance, context, and intent — making simulations feel more human and less mechanical.

 More companies will shift from single-agent copilots to fleets of task-specific agents working in coordination.

Simulation will be part of the build-measure-learn loop.

 Teams will simulate meetings, workflows, customer journeys — before writing production code.

🟢 Simulation might provide a sandbox to prototype these systems safely, understand emergent behavior, and fine-tune coordination strategies before they go live.

Organizations will begin to create persistent digital “minds”

 — internal AI agents that carry the goals, memory, and voice of individual employees or teams.

, supporting teams with decision-making, institutional memory, and context-aware advice.

Context engineering will become a critical skill

 — not just prompt design, but dynamically structuring memory, tools, and feedback loops to shape agent behavior.

🟡 Simulation is the ideal environment to explore what these minds look like, how they behave over time, and how they integrate into human workflows without breaking trust or efficiency.

 — composed of people, AI agents, and shared memory systems working together.

, not just for planning but for testing organizational changes, policy shifts, and systemic interventions before they’re deployed.

 Individuals may deploy autonomous digital twins to answer questions, manage work, or represent them in collaborative tasks when they’re offline — or long gone.

🔵 Simulation lays the foundation for modeling these futures: not with static flows, but with evolving simulations where identity, agency, and memory can interact and grow.

Shift Towards Smaller, Specialized Models

There’s a growing trend of developing compact, efficient AI models tailored for specific tasks or industries, moving away from one-size-fits-all solutions

From Static Repositories to Dynamic, Transferable Assets

➡️ Knowledge as a Modular and Transferable Asset

Recent advancements in AI have led to the development of frameworks like Adaptive Meta-Domain Transfer Learning (AMDTL), which enhance the transferability of AI models across diverse domains. This approach combines meta-learning with domain-specific adaptations, allowing AI systems to generalize knowledge and specialize contextually . Such methodologies enable the packaging of knowledge into modular units that can be efficiently transferred and adapted across various applications. (source: 

➡️ AI-Human Collaborative Knowledge Transfer

Innovative frameworks are emerging that focus on optimizing knowledge transfer between AI systems and humans. By leveraging AI-generated contextualization, these systems facilitate effective knowledge and experience transfer, improving learning outcomes . This collaborative approach ensures that knowledge is not only preserved but also enriched through continuous interaction between AI and human users. (source: 

➡️ Autonomous Knowledge Generation and Self-Improvement

LLMs are increasingly capable of self-improvement through mechanisms like self-training and synthetic data generation. For instance, models can generate their own training datasets, enhancing their performance without human intervention . This autonomy in knowledge generation signifies a shift towards AI systems that can evolve and adapt independently, further facilitating the transfer and application of knowledge across different contexts.

➡️ Integration of Structured Knowledge for Enhanced Reasoning

Efforts are underway to unify LLMs with structured knowledge representations like Knowledge Graphs (KGs). This integration aims to combine the generalization capabilities of LLMs with the explicit factual knowledge stored in KGs, enhancing the reasoning and interpretability of AI systems . Such synergy allows for more accurate and context-aware knowledge transfer, benefiting various applications. (source: 

➡️ Real-Time Knowledge Retrieval and Application

Techniques like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enable LLMs to access and incorporate up-to-date information from external sources in real-time. This approach ensures that AI systems can provide responses based on the most current data, enhancing the relevance and accuracy of knowledge application .

collaborative frameworks for knowledge transfer

, enhancing personalized learning and decision-making processes.

autonomous knowledge generation and adaptation

, leading to more resilient and versatile applications across industries.

 Establishment of integrated AI ecosystems where knowledge is continuously updated, shared, and applied in real-time, fostering a 

dynamic and interconnected knowledge infrastructure

As AI shifts from tools to collaborators, we’re entering a new design paradigm — one where we don’t just build logic, we 

. Static prompts and evaluations will no longer suffice. If we want AI systems to reason, adapt, and collaborate at scale, we need environments where intelligence can unfold — not as fixed scripts, but as living systems.


If context is the new code, then simulation is the new compiler.

To design adaptive, intelligent systems, we need more than prompts and static evaluations — we need rehearsal spaces. Environments where agents can reason, fail, adapt, and try again. Places where behavior is shaped not by instruction, but by interaction.

What if we could simulate ideas before deploying them? Strategies before implementing them? What if intelligence could be prototyped — not just in code, but in context?

A world where simulations become the sandbox for collaboration, decision-making, and knowledge transfer. 

A future where reasoning is no longer a black box — but a living process we can observe, debug, and shape.

Context is the New Code

The Next Layer of Intelligence (part 1)

A simulation framework designed to automate decision-making processes by orchestrating AI agents implementing the Actor model.

Read the serie of post about the evolution of Autobox: 

Search results

The Next Layer of Intelligence (part 2)

The Next Layer of Intelligence (part 1)

Autobox